Judge says Gaye family can’t get infringing song “Blurred Lines” banned

20 07 2015

This week, a US District judge reduced the $7.4 million award (PDF) that a jury granted to Marvin Gaye’s family in March to $5.3 million. The Gaye family had accused pop stars Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, as well as rapper T.I., of copyright infringement with their 2013 song “Blurred Lines,” which the Gaye family said sounded too much like Marvin Gaye’s 1977 hit “Got to Give it Up.”

The jury’s March verdict awarded $4 million to the Gaye family in damages as well as a calculation of the profits that Williams and Thicke made from the song—the jury decided that this amounted to $1,610,455.31 from Williams and $1,768,191.88 from Thicke.

This week, Judge Kronstadt ruled that Williams’ share of the damages was unfair, however, because Williams’ share of the producer royalties from “Blurred Lines” was only $860,333 (though Williams cleared upward of $4.2 million in publishing revenue from the song). “This award was excessive,”


The content in this post was found at http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/07/judge-says-gaye-family-cant-get-infringing-song-blurred-lines-banned/ and was not authored by the moderators of freeforafee.com. Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.



Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment