Free for a Fee

The Court found substantial evidence to support the jury’s finding of infringement. While Samsung’s expert offered conflicting testimony, a reasonable jury could have credited Apple’s expert. Thus, there was no error in the district court’s conclusion that substantial evidence supported the jury verdict of infringement… Note that the underlying dispute in this case does not concern design patents that were also asserted against Samsung, and which are currently being reviewed by the Supreme Court.

The post En Banc Federal Circuit finds substantial evidence to support jury verdict in Apple v. Samsung appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.

The content in this post was found at http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/10/14/en-banc-federal-circuit-substantial-evidence-support-jury-verdict-apple-v-samsung/id=73797/ and was not authored by the moderators of freeforafee.com. Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.