Appellate Watch: Are Domain Names “Property” That Can Be Seized Under State Forfeiture Laws?

15 12 2008

That’s the interesting issue that a Kentucky appeals court will consider on Friday in an interlocutory appeal from the ruling of a Kentucky trial court. In Commonwealth v. 141 Internet Domain Names, Case No. 08-CI-1409 (Ky Cir. Ct., Oct. 16, 2008), a Kentucky trial court ruled that Kentucky courts of general jurisdiction have subject matter and in rem jurisdiction over civil forfeiture proceedings seeking seizure of domain names through which illegal gambling was conducted in Kentucky. The court upheld its prior ex parte order finding probable cause to allow the Commonwealth of Kentucky to proceed with the seizure of 141 domain names alleged to connect users to illicit gambling Web sites. The ex parte order also directed the service of a seizure order on the registrars of the respective domain names. When the trial court scheduled the forfeiture proceeding for December 3, the appellate court granted the stay sought by the domain name and the Interactive Gaming Council (see their petition for writ of prohibition), stayed the trial court proceedings and scheduled this Friday’s oral argument.


The content in this post was found at and was not authored by the moderators of Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.



Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment