Patent Litigation Weekly: PubPat and “Patent Troll” Make Strange Bedfellows

19 06 2009

The view that software patents are an impediment to progress—common
among technologists—is rare among patent attorneys. But Dan Ravicher is
not a typical patent attorney. He founded the Public Patent Foundation (PubPat),
a public interest group that, according to its website, “represents the public’s interest against
undeserved patents and unsound policy.” PubPat recently helped the ACLU launch a major challenge to human gene patents. In the past, PubPat has also challenged broadly asserted software patents, which Ravicher believes “hinder — rather than promote — innovation.”

Meanwhile, it’s not unusual that a patent-enforcement company recently
set up in East Texas would file suit there this week against ten Internet-based and software companies. Nor is it unusual
that Texas corporate records show the company is owned by an erstwhile
big-firm lawyer, in this case David Garrod, formerly of Goodwin Procter.

What is surprising is that at the same time he is trying to wring
licensing fees from such big online names as Google, Yahoo, and Amazon,
Garrod is also spearheading a major PubPat initiative: filing lawsuits to rid the marketplace of false patent markings.


The content in this post was found at and was not authored by the moderators of Clicking the title link will take you to the source of the post.



Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment